Tag Archives: educational leadership

The Jobs of Today May not Exist Tomorrow – How do we Prepare Students?

Not long ago, I wrote a blog post entitled: Lifelong Learning is an Essential Skill, not a Buzzword. The more I read about future-readiness, 21st century skills, job market reports, and advances in technology (especially AI), the more I understand this to be true. Recently, PEW Research published a report on the Future of Jobs & Job Training.


Courtesy of Gerd Leonhardhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/gleonhard/18732734804

This report reaffirmed the fact that in the near future, millions of jobs will be lost to automation and AI that can do these tasks not only just as well, but often better than their human counterparts. These are not just rudimentary, repeatable tasks, but sophisticated, white-collar jobs that have generally been considered “safe” from automation: dermatologists, journalists, claims adjusters, financial reporters, and more. With the rise of automated driving, millions of workers who rely on driving as their means of employment are looking at becoming obsolete (long-haul truck drivers, taxi drivers, delivery wo/men, and more).

Pushing aside the very real, and daunting, questions of what this means for our job market and even Capitalism, for educators and parents this means: how do we prepare students for the stark realities of an ever shifting job market? While new technologies may be depleting jobs, knowing how to leverage them will become an even more essential skill in the future.

“The education system will need to adapt to prepare individuals for the changing labor market. At the same time, recent IT advances offer new and potentially more widely accessible ways to access education.”

Looking at how and when people learn job skills and other training will also need to be examined. Will a traditional high school, college, and beyond model remain the default given the rapidly changing employment models?

“A central question about the future, then, is whether formal and informal learning structures will evolve to meet the changing needs of people who wish to fulfill the workplace expectations of the future.”

PEW delves deeply into this topic, asking experts about their vision of the future and determined 5 Major Themes:

Five major themes about the future of jobs training in the tech age

Considering the uncertainty of the future, what we do know is that we must prepare young people to be flexible and agile learners, critical thinkers, entrepreneurs and innovators, and to know that they must develop a passion and drive for lifelong learning.

While the article is long, I strongly encourage my readers to check out PEW’s publication and put together your own thoughts.

Inspiring & Supporting Innovation at Independent Schools at this year’s ATLIS



Courtesy of Pixabay

“Innovation” — there’s a reason it’s a provocative and powerful topic in the landscape of education. Public, Charter, and Independent Schools are all feeling the pressure from disruptive innovation as well as turning to innovative practices to solve curricular, financial, and recruitment woes. The reality is, we are living in an ever-shifting landscape. Traditional routes of career readiness are no longer reliable, previously “safe” jobs (think accountants, lawyers, and doctors) are now seeing job security fade away, and “traditional” schooling is coming under more scrutiny. The cost of university education is having many individuals rethink the options of pursuing higher education given the relatively flat career landscape facing them on graduation. As such, schools are now looking at innovative practice to help them solve these problems – how can they prepare their students for the jobs of the future (especially if we don’t know what those jobs are)? As a Technology Leader, I am often a part of conversations about innovation. This is not to say that innovation is all about technology, but radical innovation often encompasses employing new technologies. Innovation is challenging… it’s hard. Why? Because it necessitates culture shift and “organizational culture eats strategy for breakfast, lunch, and dinner” — Peter Drucker.

Facing the challenges of innovation in my career and public life, I am especially excited about attending this year’s ATLIS conference in Los Angeles, California (April 24-26) as its theme is “Magic Magic Happen” and its focus is on innovation. I know that I will be inspired by the keynote speeches of Jaime Casap (Educational Evangelist) and Tim Fish (Chief Innovation Office of NAIS); both of them have worked with Independent Schools, helping them to innovate their curriculum and institutions. Looking at the posted schedule, I’m excited to learn more about innovative curriculum enhancements such as incorporating coding into the whole curriculum, implementing gamification, and creating new educational spaces, such as maker spaces in the library. Even better than learning about these initiatives, I’m especially excited to learn how to support them at my institution through transformative professional development and creating & fostering a culture of change.

This year’s ATLIS conference is the most exciting yet. If you are exploring innovative curriculum and technologies in your school, this is the year to attend! You can still register on the ATLIS website.


How to Get Hesitant Teachers to Use Technology

This post has been reblogged from my original post at PLP Voices.

In my consulting as well as administrative technology work, I am often asked the same questions by different schools and officials. One of the most common is: “How do you get teachers who are hesitant or resistant to use technology?”

I am keenly aware that many of my colleagues are not, for various reasons, gung ho about educational technology. And it’s interesting. Quite often, the teachers who are hesitant to adopt new technology are great — in fact, amazing — educators. They are frequently veterans and usually leaders in their academic field and within their institutions.

In my role as tech advocate, I habitually find myself trying to coax these established educators to use new tools and incorporate new methodologies. Here are some ways I have found to be successful in this endeavor.

1. Do not set out to “fix” anyone’s teaching

If you’re working with veteran educators, this is especially important. They have been successful in their field for many years, often decades. Perhaps they teach an AP course and are used to a high percentage of 4’s and 5’s on the AP exam. Maybe they teach a writing class and feel that they are effectively preparing their students with advanced writing skills. Regardless of their specialty, approaching a hesitant teacher with an eye to radically change their curriculum and pedagogy can feel threatening and critical.

Instead, try this: observe what they do in the classroom that’s made them successful and build out from there. Offer suggestions on how to make their good teaching practices more efficient or effective, using tools that clearly make tasks easier to accomplish. Perhaps DropBox will facilitate distributing handouts in the classroom, Google Drive is a better alternative to emailing drafts back and forth, or Google Earth can provide more interactive exploration of the Grand Canyon. Tailor your approach to each faculty member, with specific ideas to facilitate and/or enhance their teaching. As they become comfortable with new tech, they will very likely be open to conversations about other digital tools you are using in your own work.

2. Be open and alert to each teacher’s technology wants and needs

usb-tablet-150If teachers express a want or need for technology in the classroom (a particular browser, program, hardware, etc.) accommodate them! If teachers feel you are there to help them, they are more likely to reach out. The best way to demonstrate your desire to enhance their teaching is to jump through their hoops to meet their needs. If a teacher wants to use Safari, don’t dismiss their interest in favor of Chrome. You may know the tool that is “superior,” but remember it’s about their level of comfort.

3. Use peers to model and train

Teachers respond better to other teachers who share their situation. They trust them. Such teachers are “pre-vetted.” They understand what it’s like in the classroom, what can go wrong, how students can respond, etc. The absolute best way to get educators to feel comfortable seeking help with technology is to make the point person someone who does not assess their teaching. It is important to limit, if not eradicate, the intimidation factor often associated with asking for help or training in a particular tool. If a teacher feels that they are being assessed or judged (and perception is key here), they simply will avoid seeking advice. Make sure that the technology point person is someone that their peers trust and admire.

4. Give them time to “play”

Teachers are not done at three o’clock. Many work 10-12 hours a day during the school year and on weekends too. In my 12 years of serving as an educator, I have never had a “summer off.” Instead, summer is slightly less busy and my time more flexible.

tablet-smile-150Remember we’re working to lure hesitant teachers into the technology fold. Do not hold training days in the middle of the year or distribute new hardware or software in August. May and June are the best months to introduce new concepts. If you are rolling out new iPads or Netbooks, hand them out at the end of the year, just before summer. Let your faculty have the summer to play with the new tool, get comfortable with it, learn how to use it. Letting teachers edge up to a new hardware tool at home will remove the intimidation of performing under a watchful eye, and also allow them to get acquainted at their own pace. It can also help them to have “tool awareness” as they build lessons for the Fall.

I would also encourage allowing faculty to treat their school tools as their own. Let them put their music on it, have administrative privileges, set up personal email, and more. This promotes the extra level of comfort that comes with a feeling of ownership. Set up certain parameters (no illegal activities, no questionable images — and retain the rights to delete malware) and provide some education (“safe” versus “suspicious” software, best practices, etc.), but let them make the laptop or tablet or other mobile device their own. By providing your faculty the ability to intimately connect with their technology, you are providing them the capacity to really explore it and understand how it works. Give them wide latitude and allow them to be their best, professional selves.

5. Make professional development “real” and pertinent

tablet-numbers-150Don’t be afraid to differentiate your approach to professional development. Most faculty are realistic about their abilities when it comes to technology. Likewise, provide them opportunities to become effective users of real and pertinent tools that they can employ in their particular subjects and classroom. Math teachers will probably benefit more from a workshop on Geometer’s Sketchpadthan quizlet. While they may seem like babes in the technology woods, in truth, your faculty members are sophisticated professionals. Treat them as such. Focus on their pedagogical needs when you present tools. Don’t geek out.

6. Pick hardware and software that’s easy to use

The best way to overcome hesitancy with your faculty is to provide them with hardware and software that is easy to use. Modern devices and apps are more user friendly than ever. Pick tools that have “drag and drop” features, are nearly devoid of bugs, and have a low learning curve. If an educator is intimidated by coding or thrown off by a product that’s prone to crashing, they are not going to use it. Teachers know that their students get frustrated and restless if they cannot move quickly through the learning process. Technology that does not work transparently will be readily discarded.

7. Don’t sit in judgment!

I cannot emphasize this enough. It is easy to think that hesitant educates do not adopt new technology because they are lazy or stubborn or uncreative. In my experience, nothing could be further from the truth. The reality is that modern education is now a high-stakes, test driven environment. State tests and AP exams determine job security, funding, and professional perception. Experimenting with new tools and pedagogy requires not only a learning curve but some risk-taking.


The idea of “starting over” in your methods of teaching while being hyper-aware of the severe consequences for failure is daunting to all of us. Recognize this as you approach your faculty. Assuage their fears (give them test score amnesty for a year or assure them that you will present a united front should parents become frustrated). Assume the best of your staff, because that is what they are willing to give.

The world of educational technology is exciting, but it can also be frightening for some. There are a lot of tools out there and the connected world can seem chaotic to the uninitiated. Be professional with your fellow educators, understand their concerns, meet their needs, and be a champion for their growth and success.

Beyond Pockets of Excellence – Justin Reich

The last talk of the day that I attended was “Beyond Pockets of Excellence” by Justin Reich, one of the founders of EdTech Teacher and blogger for Education Week. Now, I have to leave this talk early so I will likely end the post prematurely.

Justin argues that for any technology integration to be successful, we have to ask the question: “What do you want students to be able to do?” We cannot simply add technology and stir. Rather, we need to be intentional and directed. Schools need to think carefully about their choices and means by which to measure their success.

  • What kind of change do we want?

Technical Change vs. Adaptive Change

“Does promoting your learning goals require the application of well-established procedures and technical skills? or does it require a paradigm shift in culture, values and mindset (along with a shift in procedures and technical skills)?” Ron Heifetz.

Here is a great video of Dr. Heifetz discussing the merits of these distinctions

Justin argues that we need to think more about methods than we are about tools. While the iPad is cool and has great features, we really need to think about the way that we do things. Shiny new devices may enable us to have the conversations, but that doesn’t change the fact that we need those conversations to be deep and meaningful.

Experimenting with these materials in the classroom can be scary. Teachers often fear that they will look foolish, that they won’t work, that it will fail (especially in big stakes testing environments), and that it will waste time. Ultimately, as individuals push through their discomfort they grow and then adapt. He argues that the best way to nurture the cycle of growth and institutional capacity is to provide opportunities to share their practice, even informally.

  • What can school leaders do to support change?

Think about what type of learners you want your students and faculty to be. Next, think about how you will demonstrate that in your own practice. You need to show to your faculty and/or students what you want to see in them; mirror the practice. You need to do so visibly (e.g. via social media) and let people see you making it happen.

Next, you need to encourage your faculty to take risks and branch out.

Nurturing Edupreneurs

  • provide access to hardware
  • provide time for planning and co-planning
  • provide motivation for experimentation
  • provide protection from the consequences of mistakes and failures
  • celebrating and show-casing successful projects and lessons

To truly accelerate, we need to share our practices – classroom visits, blogging, tweeting, newsletters, etc. We need to engage one another and learn from each other. Justin argues that in order to effectively collaborate and communicate, we need to use a shared, instructional language. What language we choose doesn’t matter, so long as everyone is using the same vocabulary.

  • Did we change?

Any plan of change needs to include a measurable and tangible element that we can measure to determine if we met our objective goals. This does not mean standardized testing, but we need to be able to perform empirical research to determine whether or not the investments we are making are fruitful.